How Much Does A Hospital Bed Cost Around The World ? (Interactive Map 2025

International Health Cost Index (IHCI) 2025
In a world where international mobility has never been higher, the real cost of healthcare abroad remains largely unknown to the general public. Between heavily subsidized health systems and fully liberalized markets, the price of a simple medical consultation can vary dramatically from one country to another, with direct consequences for travelers.
The HelloSafe International Health Cost Index (IHCI) was created to provide a clear, comparative, and accessible view of these differences, based on a consistent methodology and data covering the main regions of the world. The study aims to inform travelers, short-term expatriates, and professionals on the move about the potential expenses they may face in case of medical care or an emergency. By analyzing the cost of consultations, hospital stays, medication, emergency care, and insurance, the IHCI highlights both the most expensive and the most affordable countries.
United States, Switzerland, Singapore: the 3 most expensive countries for healthcare
The ranking reveals major global disparities, with a widening gap between countries with “premium” medical systems and those offering broader accessibility at lower cost. The United States and Switzerland clearly dominate the top of the ranking, illustrating the combined effect of highly specialized medical services and a largely privatized healthcare market. Behind them, a group of high-income countries — Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, Nordic countries, Japan — maintain elevated costs, driven by cutting-edge infrastructure and limited coverage for visitors.
| Country | Relative cost (IHCI /100) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 United States | 92/100 | Most expensive in the world: very high costs for care, emergencies, and hospitalization. |
| 🇨🇭 Switzerland | 85/100 | Top-tier system, but very high prices and expensive insurance. |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | 78/100 | Very high-quality care, but expensive and often requires insurance. |
| 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates | 74/100 | Attractive and modern system, but high costs for non-residents. |
| 🇧🇭 Bahrain | 72/100 | Premium services, but costly care and hospital stays for travelers. |
| 🇸🇪 Sweden | 68/100 | Excellent public system, but expensive for uninsured visitors. |
| 🇳🇴 Norway | 67/100 | Very high quality, but high prices and limited coverage for tourists. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 64/100 | Good value for quality, but still expensive without local insurance. |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | 60/100 | Medium to high cost; travel insurance strongly recommended. |
| 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 58/100 | NHS is free for residents, but care is expensive for visitors. |
| 🇨🇦 Canada | 57/100 | Free for residents; very expensive without international coverage. |
| 🇩🇰 Denmark | 56/100 | Very good quality, but paid access for tourists. |
| 🇫🇷 France | 52/100 | Good level of care at moderate cost for visitors. |
| 🇰🇷 South Korea | 51/100 | Modern and efficient, but hospital fees can be high. |
| 🇿🇦 South Africa | 50/100 | Good-quality private sector, moderate to high cost for travelers. |
| 🇪🇸 Spain | 48/100 | Good cost/quality ratio, but prices are rising in major cities. |
| 🇮🇹 Italy | 47/100 | Strong public system, variable private costs. |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | 46/100 | Free public access; private sector affordable but quality can vary. |
| 🇲🇽 Mexico | 43/100 | Private care is affordable and competitive for travelers. |
| 🇹🇭 Thailand | 38/100 | Very good value for money; major medical tourism destination. |
At the other end of the spectrum, destinations such as Mexico, Brazil, or Thailand remain attractive thanks to a well-developed and affordable private sector. Overall, the IHCI shows that healthcare costs for visitors are not strictly correlated with a country’s level of economic development: they depend above all on the local financing model, the degree of privatization, and how far non-residents are included in insurance and public coverage schemes.
In Europe, Northern countries are the most expensive for healthcare
The European ranking reveals a clear divide between Northwestern Europe — where health systems are high-performing but very expensive for non-residents — and Southern and Eastern Europe, where access to care remains generally affordable. Nordic countries, along with Ireland, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands, show high prices driven by advanced medical infrastructure and a strong reliance on private or mandatory insurance for travelers. By contrast, Southern Europe offers a better cost/quality balance, particularly in Spain, Italy, and Portugal, where private care remains competitive.
| Country | IHCI score /100 | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇭 Switzerland | 85 | Most expensive in Europe, premium system with very high costs. |
| 🇸🇪 Sweden | 68 | High-performing care but expensive without insurance. |
| 🇳🇴 Norway | 67 | Excellent quality, high prices for non-residents. |
| 🇮🇸 Iceland | 65 | Limited infrastructure, high prices. |
| 🇮🇪 Ireland | 62 | Expensive care; insurance is almost essential. |
| 🇱🇺 Luxembourg | 60 | High prices, excellent quality. |
| 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 58 | NHS free for residents, expensive for visitors. |
| 🇳🇱 Netherlands | 57 | Mandatory insurance, high costs. |
| 🇩🇰 Denmark | 56 | Strong public system, but paid access for visitors. |
| 🇫🇮 Finland | 55 | Moderate to high cost. |
| 🇩🇪 Germany | 54 | Mixed public/private model, moderate costs. |
| 🇫🇷 France | 52 | Good cost/quality ratio. |
| 🇲🇹 Malta | 50 | Private care is expensive. |
| 🇧🇪 Belgium | 50 | Excellent quality, medium costs. |
| 🇪🇸 Spain | 48 | Very good cost/quality ratio. |
| 🇮🇹 Italy | 47 | Robust public sector, variable private prices. |
| 🇵🇹 Portugal | 45 | Affordable and reliable. |
| 🇸🇮 Slovenia | 45 | Strong public system, medium costs. |
| 🇨🇿 Czechia | 43 | Good quality, moderate costs. |
| 🇬🇷 Greece | 42 | Affordable public care, more expensive private sector. |
| 🇭🇺 Hungary | 41 | Competitive private sector, reasonable prices. |
| 🇵🇱 Poland | 40 | Very affordable public care. |
| 🇸🇰 Slovakia | 38 | Low cost, accessible services. |
| 🇭🇷 Croatia | 42 | Solid public system, moderate prices. |
| 🇷🇴 Romania | 32 | Very affordable, variable quality. |
| 🇷🇸 Serbia | 34 | Very low costs. |
| 🇧🇬 Bulgaria | 30 | Low cost, accessible private care. |
| 🇧🇦 Bosnia and Herzegovina | 28 | Very low cost. |
| 🇦🇱 Albania | 27 | One of the lowest healthcare costs in Europe. |
| 🇲🇩 Moldova | 26 | Very affordable, limited supply. |
| 🇽🇰 Kosovo | 25 | Very low costs, variable availability. |
| 🇺🇦 Ukraine | 24 | Extremely low costs. |
Further east, the Balkans and Eastern Europe show the lowest costs on the continent, reflecting very accessible financing models but sometimes more heterogeneous quality. Overall, Europe presents a contrasted picture where economic development levels do not fully explain what visitors actually pay: structural choices, the role of the private sector, and insurance models are the main drivers of the final cost for travelers.
Africa: South Africa is the most expensive country for healthcare
Across Africa, healthcare costs are highly heterogeneous, mainly influenced by economic development, the presence of a structured private sector, and dependence on imported medical products and technology. The most expensive countries, such as South Africa, Mauritius, and Seychelles, stand out for their well-developed private networks, which remain costly for travelers. At the opposite end, a large part of the continent shows very low prices, reflecting cheap public tariffs but also, at times, limited capacity and infrastructure.
| Country | IHCI score /100 | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 South Africa | 50 | Good-quality private sector, moderate overall cost. |
| 🇲🇺 Mauritius | 48 | Modern private sector, but expensive. |
| 🇸🇨 Seychelles | 45 | High costs for travelers. |
| 🇳🇦 Namibia | 45 | Reliable private sector, medium costs. |
| 🇧🇼 Botswana | 44 | Solid system. |
| 🇦🇴 Angola | 39 | Expensive private care, strong dependence on the international sector. |
| 🇪🇬 Egypt | 38 | Affordable but uneven private sector. |
| 🇳🇬 Nigeria | 36 | Relatively expensive private care, affordable public system. |
| 🇬🇦 Gabon | 40 | Expensive private care, good quality. |
| 🇰🇪 Kenya | 40 | Modern private sector, but costly in major cities. |
| 🇲🇦 Morocco | 35 | Affordable overall, quality varies. |
| 🇨🇻 Cape Verde | 35 | Expensive private sector, limited resources. |
| 🇬🇭 Ghana | 34 | Moderate costs, growing private sector. |
| 🇨🇮 Côte d’Ivoire | 33 | Affordable private care. |
| 🇹🇳 Tunisia | 33 | Good cost/quality ratio. |
| 🇨🇬 Congo | 33 | Moderate costs. |
| 🇿🇼 Zimbabwe | 31 | Moderate costs. |
| 🇬🇲 Gambia | 30 | Very accessible. |
| 🇨🇲 Cameroon | 30 | Low costs, strong disparities. |
| 🇺🇬 Uganda | 30 | Very affordable. |
| 🇩🇿 Algeria | 30 | Very affordable public sector. |
| 🇿🇲 Zambia | 29 | Affordable, limited offer. |
| 🇧🇯 Benin | 29 | Low costs. |
| 🇬🇳 Guinea | 27 | Low cost. |
| 🇲🇿 Mozambique | 27 | Affordable. |
| 🇹🇬 Togo | 28 | Low cost. |
| 🇷🇼 Rwanda | 28 | Strong public sector. |
| 🇲🇬 Madagascar | 25 | Very low cost. |
| 🇸🇱 Sierra Leone | 25 | Very affordable. |
| 🇲🇼 Malawi | 24 | Very affordable, limited offer. |
| 🇪🇹 Ethiopia | 24 | Low costs. |
| 🇰🇲 Comoros | 24 | Affordable. |
North Africa occupies an intermediate position, benefiting from relatively solid infrastructure and an attractive profile for medical tourism. In East and West Africa, cost levels vary widely depending on urbanization and the quality of the private sector. In conflict-affected or economically fragile countries, a lack of reliable data makes it difficult to accurately assess access and pricing, and these countries are therefore not fully integrated into the index.
Asia: from “premium” systems to very affordable care
Asia displays an extremely contrasted healthcare landscape, ranging from some of the most expensive “premium” systems in the world — such as Singapore, Hong Kong, and major Gulf capitals — to countries where care remains very accessible, particularly in South Asia. Advanced East Asian economies — Japan, South Korea, Taiwan — combine high technological standards with costs that are often more moderate for visitors than in Western countries.
| Country | IHCI score /100 | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | 78 | Top-tier system, very expensive for visitors. |
| 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates | 73 | High-end private sector, elevated prices. |
| 🇶🇦 Qatar | 71 | Expensive private care, strong reliance on insurance. |
| 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | 70 | Efficient public sector, very expensive private care. |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | 64 | High quality, moderate costs for uninsured visitors. |
| 🇰🇷 South Korea | 63 | Premium infrastructure, costly private care. |
| 🇧🇭 Bahrain | 62 | Modern system, high costs. |
| 🇮🇱 Israel | 60 | Excellent quality, high prices for travelers. |
| 🇰🇼 Kuwait | 58 | Expensive medical access for non-residents. |
| 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | 55 | Growing private sector, rising costs. |
| 🇨🇳 China | 50 | Highly variable costs between public and private. |
| 🇹🇼 Taiwan | 48 | Excellent value for visitors. |
| 🇲🇾 Malaysia | 40 | Reliable private sector, competitive prices. |
| 🇹🇭 Thailand | 38 | Very good cost/quality ratio, major medical tourism hub. |
| 🇮🇩 Indonesia | 35 | Affordable for routine care. |
| 🇵🇭 Philippines | 33 | Accessible private sector, very affordable public care. |
| 🇻🇳 Vietnam | 32 | Low costs, improving private sector. |
| 🇮🇳 India | 30 | Very affordable, attractive private sector. |
| 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka | 29 | Free public care, low-cost private sector. |
| 🇰🇭 Cambodia | 28 | Affordable, strong reliance on private clinics. |
| 🇳🇵 Nepal | 27 | Very low costs. |
| 🇧🇩 Bangladesh | 26 | Very accessible care. |
| 🇵🇰 Pakistan | 25 | Very low cost, high variability. |
| 🇱🇦 Laos | 25 | Very accessible, limited offer. |
Southeast Asia stands out as a major hub for medical tourism, with Thailand and Malaysia offering an excellent cost/quality balance. In lower-income countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, or Nepal, very low prices often go hand in hand with more limited infrastructure and resources. As in other regions, countries affected by conflict or instability lack reliable data, preventing their full inclusion in the index.
Americas & Caribbean: among the most expensive regions for healthcare
The Americas present extreme contrasts: the region includes both the most expensive healthcare system in the world — the United States — and some of the most affordable, such as Bolivia or Cuba. North America dominates the top of the ranking due to the weight of the private sector and the lack of subsidized access for visitors. In South America, costs remain generally moderate, supported by reasonably priced private sectors in countries such as Chile, Uruguay, and Colombia.
| Country | IHCI score /100 | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 United States | 92 | Most expensive in the world: private sector dominates and prices are very high. |
| 🇨🇦 Canada | 57 | Free for residents, expensive for visitors without insurance. |
| 🇧🇸 Bahamas | 56 | Costly private sector, strong dependence on medical imports. |
| 🇧🇲 Bermuda | 55 | Very expensive system, heavy reliance on private care. |
| 🇧🇧 Barbados | 52 | High costs for specialized care. |
| 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago | 50 | Strong public sector, relatively costly private care. |
| 🇺🇾 Uruguay | 48 | Good quality, high prices in the private sector. |
| 🇨🇱 Chile | 47 | Efficient private sector, rising costs. |
| 🇦🇷 Argentina | 46 | Accessible public system, moderately expensive private care. |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | 46 | Free public care, private sector ranges from affordable to moderate. |
| 🇲🇽 Mexico | 43 | Competitive private sector, attractive for travelers. |
| 🇨🇴 Colombia | 40 | Good private care, very reasonable prices. |
| 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | 39 | High quality, moderate costs. |
| 🇵🇦 Panama | 38 | Modern private sector, relatively affordable. |
| 🇵🇪 Peru | 34 | Low costs, variable quality. |
| 🇪🇨 Ecuador | 33 | Accessible private sector, attractive for expats. |
| 🇩🇴 Dominican Republic | 33 | Affordable private sector; medical tourism is growing. |
| 🇬🇹 Guatemala | 30 | Low costs, limited infrastructure. |
| 🇵🇾 Paraguay | 29 | Very affordable. |
| 🇭🇳 Honduras | 28 | Low cost, variable quality. |
| 🇳🇮 Nicaragua | 26 | Very accessible care. |
| 🇸🇻 El Salvador | 26 | Affordable public system, low-cost private care. |
| 🇧🇴 Bolivia | 25 | Very low cost. |
| 🇯🇲 Jamaica | 25 | Moderate costs, dependence on private sector. |
| 🇨🇺 Cuba | 24 | Very affordable public care, private sector mostly for visitors. |
In Central America, care is generally affordable, although quality can vary significantly. The Caribbean oscillates between very expensive systems (Bahamas, Bermuda) and more mixed models offering better value. As in other regions, political or economic instability in some countries limits data availability and makes it difficult to include them completely in the index.
Countries that do not appear in these tables currently lack sufficiently reliable or comparable data to produce a robust index value.
They may be included in future editions of the IHCI once consistent and verifiable sources become available.
Data Sources
1. Economic data and purchasing power parity
- World Bank – World Development Indicators
- OECD – Health at a Glance 2024
- Numbeo – Cost of Living & Health Care Index 2025
- IMF – World Economic Outlook Database
2. Health data and medical cost benchmarks
- World Health Organization (WHO) – Global Health Expenditure Database
- International Federation of Health Plans (IFHP) – Comparative Price Reports
- Expatistan – Healthcare Cost Comparison by City (2025)
- OECD Health Data – Average hospital and consultation costs
- National Ministries of Health – official publications and annual reports
3. Travel insurance and international health coverage
- Allianz Partners, AXA Assistance, Cigna Global – Travel insurance cost benchmarks
- OECD / WHO – Universal health coverage statistics
- Comparative studies by The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)
4. Data adjustments and weighting
- Exchange rates and PPP adjustments via the World Bank (2025)
- Cross-checking with World Population Review and Global Health Index 2025
- Validation against local studies and public hospital data
Methodology of the International Health Cost Index (IHCI)
The goal of the IHCI is to evaluate and compare the relative cost of healthcare across key countries, in order to help travelers understand the potential expenses they may face if they need medical care abroad.
1. Criteria and weighting
| Criterion | Description | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| A. Basic medical consultation | Average cost of a general practitioner visit without insurance. | 20% |
| B. Hospitalization (1 night) | Average price of one night in a standard private hospital room. | 25% |
| C. Common medications | Cost of a standard basket (antibiotics, painkillers, etc.). | 15% |
| D. Emergency care | Average cost of an emergency room visit with light treatment. | 20% |
| E. Local health insurance / coverage | Ease of access to affordable, short-term health coverage for travelers. | 10% |
| F. Purchasing power parity / cost of living | Adjustment factor relative to local income and cost of living. | Adjustment |
2. Detail of key criteria
A. Cost of routine care (30%)
Evaluates the expenses a traveler might face during a minor health episode.
- General practitioner and specialist consultations
- Basic blood tests
- Average price of essential medications (antibiotics, analgesics, anti-inflammatories)
B. Cost of emergency care (25%)
Measures the costs in case of an accident or acute illness:
- Emergency room admission
- Imaging (X-ray, CT scan)
- Light intensive care
- Unplanned urgent procedures
C. Hospitalization (25%)
Compares the costs associated with:
- One day of hospitalization in a standard room
- A common surgical procedure (appendicitis, fracture, etc.)
- Specialized services (monitoring, anesthesia)
Private sector prices are used as the main reference, as private hospitals and clinics are often the only realistic option for travelers who need rapid, high-quality care.
D. Private sector: quality, price, and accessibility (10%)
Composite criterion assessing:
- Average prices charged in the private sector
- Accessibility for foreigners (waiting times, refusals, immediate access)
- Technological level (equipment, international accreditations, presence of premium clinics)
E. Local insurance / coverage for non-residents (10%)
This criterion focuses specifically on the ability of a traveler to obtain local health coverage, not the coverage available to residents.
- Availability of short-term local health insurance products
- Average price of temporary coverage
- Whether non-residents can be included in some public schemes
- Level of reimbursement for major or catastrophic events
The more limited or expensive this coverage is, the higher the IHCI score for the country — and the more costly it is considered for visitors.
3. Conversion into an IHCI score
- Convert all cost values into USD
- Adjust via a purchasing power parity (PPP) coefficient
- Normalize each indicator on a 0–100 scale
- Apply the weights by criterion
- Aggregate into a final IHCI score per country
4. Update frequency
The index is updated annually, with a full review of weights and indicators every three years in order to track:
- Global medical inflation
- Structural changes and reforms in health systems
- New patterns and products in international and travel health insurance
By combining quantitative rigor with qualitative analysis, the International Health Cost Index is designed as a decision-support tool for travelers, tourism professionals, and public authorities, highlighting both the world’s most expensive countries for healthcare and those where care remains most accessible.
On the same topic
- Travel Insurance for American Travellers: Compare Plans & Get the Right Coverage
- The Most Underrated Destinations in the World in 2026
- HelloSafe Global Prosperity Index 2025
- Best Countries to Visit in 2025: Global Attractivity Index Ranking
- [HelloSafe Safety Index] The Map of the Safest Countries to Travel to in 2025
