[HelloSafe Safety Index] The Map of the Safest Countries to Travel to in 2025

Safety Score (/100)
In a world marked by growing uncertainties โ whether political, sanitary, digital, or environmental โ the notion of global safety has become an essential indicator of a country's quality of life. The feeling of security, once limited to crime or political stability, now extends to health security, digital protection, and ecological resilience.
Faced with this complexity, the Safety Index offers a comprehensive and multidimensional evaluation framework, allowing us to measure the overall safety level of a territory for its residents, visitors, and economic actors. This index is based on a systemic approach integrating five major pillars:
- Public safety and crime, the foundation of physical security.
- Political and social stability, a prerequisite for trust and predictability.
- Health and healthcare security, indicating a countryโs ability to protect its population during crises.
- Cybersecurity and digital safety, a major challenge in an interconnected world.
- Environmental security and natural risk management, reflecting the sustainability of human and natural systems.
By combining data from international organizations (UN, World Bank, WHO, ITU, Transparency International, ND-GAIN, etc.) and perception-based indicators (Numbeo, WJP, OECD), the Safety Index aims to produce a composite score (0โ100), comparable between countries and updatable over time.
The purpose is not only to rank nations according to their safety level, but also to identify their strengths and vulnerabilities in order to support public decision-making, tourism development, foreign investment, or urban resilience strategies.
This methodological framework provides an integrated reading of safety at the intersection of human, technological, and environmental issues. It offers a scalable foundation for anticipating emerging risks and strengthening global security in a sustainable way.
๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland, ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland and ๐ณ๐ด Norway: the 3 safest countries to travel to in 2025
The global ranking of the 50 safest countries to travel to highlights the dominance of Nordic nations (Iceland, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Switzerland), which stand as true models of global safety. Their excellence results from an exceptional combination of almost non-existent crime, long-lasting political stability, transparent institutions, and exemplary healthcare systems. These countries embody a balance between public safety, social trust, and environmental resilience, placing quality of life and risk prevention at the core of their national model.
Behind them, Asia-Pacific countries such as Singapore, Japan, New Zealand, and Australia distinguish themselves through excellence in cybersecurity, social discipline, and advanced urban management. In Europe, Western and Northern countries remain strong performers, while Central Europe (Estonia, Slovenia, Czech Republic) is progressing quickly thanks to effective digital and institutional policies. Portugal, Spain, and Italy also offer high safety levels for travelers, despite certain challenges related to corruption or pollution.
| Rank | Country | Safety Index /100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland | 92.4 |
| 2 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 91.1 |
| 3 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | 90.85 |
| 4 | ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland | 90.6 |
| 5 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark | 89.95 |
| 6 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 88.7 |
| 7 | ๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand | 88.45 |
| 8 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 87.9 |
| 9 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 86.8 |
| 10 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 86.35 |
| 11 | ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | 85.90 |
| 12 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 85.6 |
| 13 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 84.7 |
| 14 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 84.4 |
| 15 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 83.85 |
| 16 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | 83.5 |
| 17 | ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 82.9 |
| 18 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czech Republic | 82.3 |
| 19 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia | 81.95 |
| 20 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 81.6 |
| 21 | ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 81.1 |
| 22 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 80.55 |
| 23 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 80.2 |
| 24 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 79.9 |
| 25 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 79.7 |
| 26 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 79.15 |
| 27 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 79 |
| 28 | ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia | 78.45 |
| 29 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel | 78.3 |
| 30 | ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovakia | 77.8 |
| 31 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 77.5 |
| 32 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 77.1 |
| 33 | ๐ฒ๐น Malta | 76.85 |
| 34 | ๐จ๐พ Cyprus | 76.4 |
| 35 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | 75.9 |
| 36 | ๐ง๐ญ Bahrain | 75.35 |
| 37 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar | 75.1 |
| 38 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 74.95 |
| 39 | ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica | 74.4 |
| 40 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 74 |
| 41 | ๐บ๐พ Uruguay | 73.8 |
| 42 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Morocco | 73.25 |
| 43 | ๐น๐ณ Tunisia | 72.9 |
| 44 | ๐ด๐ฒ Oman | 72.6 |
| 45 | ๐ง๐ณ Brunei | 72.1 |
| 46 | ๐น๐ท Tรผrkiye | 71.65 |
| 47 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan | 71.3 |
| 48 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | 70.95 |
| 49 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | 70.4 |
| 50 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria | 69.8 |
Top 1โ10: Countries with extremely low crime, high political stability, strong healthcare systems, advanced cyber capabilities, and low climate vulnerability.
11โ30: OECD/EU countries with strong overall performance but possible weaknesses in perception, local pollution, or road mortality.
31โ50: Countries safe for travelers but with relative structural weaknesses such as regional political risk, pollution, or lower digital protection.
Finally, several emerging countries such as Costa Rica, Chile, and Morocco appear in the top 50, showing that stable political conditions and peaceful societies can compensate for economic limitations. This ranking illustrates a major global shift: safety no longer depends only on maintaining order, but on a holistic approach including health, the environment, and digital security.
The Safety Index therefore introduces a new paradigm: safety as a reflection of a country's institutional quality and overall resilience.
Top 10 safest countries in Europe
Europe remains the safest region in the world for travelers, dominated by Nordic and Alpine countries. ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland, ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland, ๐ณ๐ด Norway, and ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland form a core of exceptional stability, where crime is nearly non-existent and institutional trust is extremely high. Their societies are built on transparent governance, cohesive social fabric, and high levels of equality โ factors that mechanically reduce internal tensions.
These countries also excel in environmental resilience and health preparedness. Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria combine strong urban safety, advanced cybersecurity, and robust infrastructure. Even Sweden, despite occasional increases in crime, remains one of the safest countries in Europe. Overall, the continent illustrates the maturity of an integrated security model based on prevention, trust, and collective well-being.
| Rank | Country | Safety Index /100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland | 92.4 |
| 2 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 91.1 |
| 3 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | 90.85 |
| 4 | ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland | 90.6 |
| 5 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark | 89.95 |
| 6 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 86.8 |
| 7 | ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | 85.9 |
| 8 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 85.6 |
| 9 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 84.7 |
| 10 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 84.4 |
Top 10 safest Asian countries
The Asian ranking reflects the power of long-term planning and strong institutional control. At the top, Singapore and Japan embody excellence in public safety, civic discipline, and cybersecurity. South Korea and Taiwan benefit from highly advanced digital governance and socially disciplined populations. In the Gulf region, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain maintain remarkable stability through massive investments in surveillance systems, modern infrastructure, and healthcare capacity.
However, regional geopolitical tensions and energy dependency remain areas requiring close monitoring. Malaysia and Brunei stand out for their high urban safety levels and relatively low corruption. Asia as a whole illustrates a security model based on technology, prevention, and strong state effectiveness โ a model where political stability consistently outweighs individual freedom.
| Rank | Country | Safety Index /100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 88.7 |
| 2 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 87.9 |
| 3 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 79.9 |
| 4 | ๐น๐ผ Taiwan | 79.0 |
| 5 | ๐ง๐ญ Bahrain | 75.35 |
| 6 | ๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar | 75.1 |
| 7 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 74.95 |
| 8 | ๐ด๐ฒ Oman | 72.6 |
| 9 | ๐ง๐ณ Brunei | 72.1 |
| 10 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | 70.95 |
Top 10 safest African countries
Africa presents a contrasting landscape: regions of significant instability coexist with strongholds of enduring safety. At the top of the ranking, Mauritius, Botswana, and Namibia demonstrate that stable democratic systems and prudent governance can offer a secure and attractive environment for travelers. Rwanda โ often cited for its public order and administrative efficiency โ stands out with strong urban safety despite its recent history.
Morocco and Tunisia also score well thanks to solid political stability and increased security measures in tourist areas. Countries such as Ghana and Senegal represent an Africa of moderation, where major risks remain relatively limited. Overall, African safety is improving due to better institutions, the rise of sustainable tourism, and growing attention to emerging cybersecurity challenges.
| Rank | Country | Safety Index /100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐ฒ๐บ Mauritius | 76 |
| 2 | ๐ง๐ผ Botswana | 74 |
| 3 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Morocco | 73.25 |
| 4 | ๐น๐ณ Tunisia | 72.9 |
| 5 | ๐ณ๐ฆ Namibia | 72.5 |
| 6 | ๐ท๐ผ Rwanda | 71.5 |
| 7 | ๐ฌ๐ญ Ghana | 70.5 |
| 8 | ๐ธ๐ณ Senegal | 70 |
| 9 | ๐ฒ๐ฌ Madagascar | 69 |
| 10 | ๐ฟ๐ฒ Zambia | 68.5 |
Top 10 safest Latin American countries
In Latin America, safety remains highly uneven, but several countries clearly stand out due to coherent public policies and long-term governance. Costa Rica ๐จ๐ท โ without an army and centered on civil peace โ remains the safest country in the region, symbolizing unique democratic stability. Chile ๐จ๐ฑ and Uruguay ๐บ๐พ follow closely, supported by strong institutions, low corruption, and effective public health systems.
Panama ๐ต๐ฆ benefits from its strategic location and economic dynamism to maintain high levels of urban safety. Argentina ๐ฆ๐ท and Paraguay ๐ต๐พ fluctuate between stability and moderate social tensions. Peru ๐ต๐ช and Bolivia ๐ง๐ด are progressing slowly, while Colombia ๐จ๐ด and Ecuador ๐ช๐จ continue to face security challenges linked to drug trafficking and organized crime. Overall, the region shows that stable governance, social reforms, and a shift toward sustainable tourism can mitigate long-standing structural fragilities.
| Rank | Country | Safety Index /100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica | 74.4 |
| 2 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 74.0 |
| 3 | ๐บ๐พ Uruguay | 73.8 |
| 4 | ๐ต๐ฆ Panama | 72.5 |
| 5 | ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina | 71.0 |
| 6 | ๐ต๐พ Paraguay | 70.0 |
| 7 | ๐ต๐ช Peru | 69.0 |
| 8 | ๐ง๐ด Bolivia | 68.0 |
| 9 | ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 67.0 |
| 10 | ๐ช๐จ Ecuador | 66.0 |
Methodology
1. Methodological Objective
The goal is to produce a composite score (0โ100) measuring a countryโs safety for residents and travelers across five dimensions:
- Public safety and crime (35%)
- Political and social stability (25%)
- Health and sanitary security (15%)
- Cybersecurity and digital safety (15%)
- Environmental security and natural risks (10%)
Each dimension is composed of sub-indicators as defined in the initial analytical framework. The objective is to build a transparent, reproducible, traceable, and updatable index.
2. Data Sources (principles and recommended list)
- Objective criteria: UNODC / Our World in Data (homicides), WHO (road deaths, health), World Bank (WGI), ND-GAIN, ITU GCI, Transparency International (CPI).
- Perception & urban safety: Numbeo (Crime Index, City Safety Index), noting associated biases.
- Cybercrime prevalence: Comparitech / Surfshark / Europol reports; otherwise proxy via complaints per 100k or incident reports.
- Social tension: ACLED (violent events), Economist Intelligence Unit risk indices.
Preferred formats: CSV, JSON or API access. Each dataset must include at minimum: country (ISO3), year, indicator, unit, source, URL, retrieval date.
3. Normalization and Processing
Each indicator is transformed into a 0โ100 scale using minโmax normalization. Negative indicators (e.g., homicide rate, pollution, perceived crime) are reversed so that high scores always reflect greater safety. Extreme values are adjusted using winsorization to reduce the impact of outliers. Missing data is imputed using the regional median when necessary.
4. Weighting and Aggregation
Sub-indicators are aggregated within each pillar using their respective weights, then combined to produce a final score:
Safety Index = ฮฃ (Wk ร Dk) for k = 1 to 5
Where Wk represents the weight of the pillar and Dk its normalized score.
This calculation results in a global score out of 100, allowing comparability between countries. Note that weighting applies at the global and regional levels, meaning a country may appear in the global Top 50 yet have a slightly different score within its regional ranking.
5. Robustness and Verification
Sensitivity tests were conducted to measure the impact of alternative weightings and normalization methods. Correlations with major international indices (GPI, HDI) confirm the coherence and robustness of the model.
6. Limitations and Interpretation
This ranking combines objective data and perception-based indicators; therefore, it reflects relative global safety rather than absolute conditions. Internal disparities (regions, major cities) are not always captured. However, the Safety Index provides a strong and consistent basis for comparing the stability and perceived safety of countries worldwide.
On the same topic
- Travel Insurance for American Travellers: Compare Plans & Get the Right Coverage
- The Most Underrated Destinations in the World in 2026
- HelloSafe Global Prosperity Index 2025
- How Much Does A Hospital Bed Cost Around The World ? (Interactive Map 2025
- Best Countries to Visit in 2025: Global Attractivity Index Ranking
